<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better SSL error screens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.owlfolio.org/htmletc/ssl-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.owlfolio.org/htmletc/ssl-errors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.owlfolio.org/htmletc/ssl-errors/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owl-folio.nfshost.com/?p=745#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No time frame for any of this, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We already serve lots of the in-browser help off &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.mozilla.com/&quot;&gt;support.mozilla.com&lt;/a&gt;, but that might not do with a malicious router in the middle.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No time frame for any of this, sorry.</p>
<p>We already serve lots of the in-browser help off <a href="http://support.mozilla.com/">support.mozilla.com</a>, but that might not do with a malicious router in the middle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Sá</title>
		<link>http://www.owlfolio.org/htmletc/ssl-errors/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Sá</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 02:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owl-folio.nfshost.com/?p=745#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>Also (and sorry for the double post), the secure site check could be made easier by providing a link to a secure site inside mozilla, some kind of support site for these matters. It should be easy to set up, and would stop the user from relying on their knowledge about which sites are secure, or what a secure site is at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also (and sorry for the double post), the secure site check could be made easier by providing a link to a secure site inside mozilla, some kind of support site for these matters. It should be easy to set up, and would stop the user from relying on their knowledge about which sites are secure, or what a secure site is at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Sá</title>
		<link>http://www.owlfolio.org/htmletc/ssl-errors/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Sá</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 02:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owl-folio.nfshost.com/?p=745#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>Wow! This looks like a big improvement! Great stuff! Is it possible that this makes it into the 3.7 release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This looks like a big improvement! Great stuff! Is it possible that this makes it into the 3.7 release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

